The Infinite Prime Number Proof
As
the title states, this blog will be primarily concerned with Euclid's 2500 year
old proof which we began in class. Proving such a statement required us to
prove the contradiction false which we began by assuming n to be an element of
the natural numbers. So essentially, the set of prime numbers must be less than
or equal to n. We then set m equal to the product of all the elements of P (the
set of prime numbers) and deduced that m + 1 could then be a prime number. Now
we have to take into account that m + 1 may or may not be a new prime number. So from here my thought process was that if it is a new prime number, this side of the proof is resolved. On the other hand if its not a new prime number then we have to somehow prove that a new prime number somehow arises from this. Now if we factor any integer we can rewrite that integer as the product of prime numbers. So if we take the number m + 1, it cannot be divided by any element of P otherwise there would be a remainder of 1. Therefore in order to write m + 1 as a product of some prime number times some other number, that prime number must be a new prime number not listed in P. To conclude, in both cases we result in new prime numbers outside of the set P and so there must be an infinite amount of prime numbers.Before I end the blog I'd like to state a quick thought on our recent midterm. I thought it was very straight forward and was pleasantly surprised at its difficulty. For a 60 minute test I believe it was very fair. To conclude, I'm really liking this course and aim to take more courses of the like in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment